
The Training Session
The hardest part about being an election day worker is not beginning the training session by pretending that you’re a member of the Exclusive Brethren, and greeting all the other Election Day Workers as if they were also members of the Exclusive Brethren. It seems like this would be an extremely funny thing to do, except that a training session for Election Day Workers is clearly not the place for sophisticated political satire of this type. Thus, our evening training session was devoted to practical matters such as how to assemble the fiendishly clever cardboard voting booths, what to stamp with your issuing officer stamp (most everything) and how to work out which electorate people are supposed to be in using the Great Big Book of Every Street In New Zealand.
We also signed an oath promising not to breach the terms of a particular section of the Electoral Act, which we were not shown. When I asked, nobody seemed to have a copy available and nobody was exactly sure what it said, but we assumed collectively that it was probably about being impartial and not telling people who to vote for. I signed it because I suspected that if I didn’t people behind me would make loud sighing noises and roll their eyes.
Upon completing our training, we were each issued with our Inconveniently Large Democracy Boxes. Among the other accoutrements of the Issuing Officer, these contained many pads of actual real unused ballot papers. Until this point I had not really thought about how the ballot papers would get to the the polling station, and it had not occurred to me that I would carry them there on my bicycle. Something about this didn’t seem safe.
After exploring a few scenarios in my head, however, it became apparent that if I were to attempt to rig an election, gaining access to unmarked voting papers would not be the difficult part. The tricky bit would be later on, when I would have to convince everybody else in the polling station to look the other way while I slipped my bundle of votes into the ballot box, and then come up with some convincing explanation for exactly where all my individually-numbered ballot papers had got to. So no problems there, really.
My Inconveniently Large Democracy Box was much too large to carry home on my bicycle, so I had to accept a lift. If you ever volunteer to help run an election, you should be aware that the Democracy Box is Inconveniently Large.
On the week leading up to Election Day, my cats and I guarded my votes from intruders. I by watching out for villains and my cats by sleeping on top of the Democracy Box. I also read my Personal Instruction Manual, which covered again the basic points of how to run an election and providing such useful other gems of advice as:
Try to wear colours that do not suggest support for any particular party.
Greet the voter and ask them to sit down.
Do not talk down to a physically impaired person or make inappropriate gestures such as patting the person on the head.
Do not give any advice on whom to vote for to any person.
Refrain from using remarks such as “do you have a license to drive that thing” or “how fast can you go” to initiate conversation with persons in wheelchairs.
It occurs to me, incidentally, that a great deal of good might be done for the cause of world peace by compiling a book indexed by ethnic group, gender, sexual preference, hair colour and so forth, and for each category of human being providing a list of weak jokes that they have definitely heard before.
The Election Day
Having transferred my papers and my issuing officer stamp from the Inconveniently Large Democracy Box to a more convenient set of saddlebags, I arrived on election day at the Bailey Road School Hall in the general electorate of Mount Wellington and the Maori electorate of Tamaki Makaurau. I wore black and brown. My allocated role was to sit behind a cardboard desk and issue special votes, which are more complicated than ordinary votes, and require a lot more stamping.
There are several ways a person may be allocated a special vote.
They may be overseas and mailing in their votes. This is not really my problem, because they don’t mail them to me. But good on them.
They may be outside the electorate they’re enrolled for. This is why I had the Great Big Book, and sets of voting papers for every electorate in the country. Most of my voters in this category were from other parts of Auckland, although I did get one from as far away as Nelson.
They may not be on the printed electoral roll that is supposed to be a list of everyone in the country who is eligible to vote. It is unfortunately not perfect, and some people find themselves, through no fault of their own, in a zombie-like limbo state of no-enrollment which can be cured by signing a special declaration form. Actually, everybody who makes a special vote gets to fill in the form. Filling in a form is really the essence of special voting, and is so important that I had to stamp it in two different places.
I also had to sign each form to testify that I, in my capacity as an Issuing Officer, had personally sighted each voter and judged them to be real. Then I gave them a voting paper, which I stamped, and a special two-sided envelope with a place to seal the declaration and another place to seal the ballot, which I stamped. After that, my stamping was completed, and the voter was permitted to retire to the privacy of a cardboard voting booth to make their selection.
There was a special ballot box for special voters, which was too small. I delegated to myself the extra duty of periodically picking it up and shaking it to help all the special votes settle at the bottom and make room for more at the top.
The Turnout
Given that we weren’t situated in the central city or near a busy shopping area or even on the main road, we were expecting to collect maybe a few hundred votes over the course of the day. As it happened, we received around 1500. It was a busy day with a steady stream of voters from opening at 9am to closing at 7pm.
Some had clearly never voted before, and were unfamiliar with the MMP system. I had to explain the ballot paper to a lot of people, covering the distinction between their party vote and their candidate vote, and answering questions about whether you have to vote for a candidate from the same party as your party vote (no) and whether you’re allowed to just vote for a party and skip the candidate vote (yes). In the past I have been a supporter of the STV system as superior to MMP, but I am now convinced that two votes is complicated enough for most people who don’t make an active effort to follow politics. If I’d had to explain how to rank candidates in numerical order as one does under STV, there would have been a very long queue.
One man was confused by the ten identical cardboard voting booths we had, and wanted to know which one belonged to which party so that he’d know which one to stand behind. Another tried to put his unmarked voting paper straight into the ballot box immediately after receiving it - apparently he had thought that his special vote declaration was the actual vote.
The closest we came to electoral fraud was an apparently recent immigrant who had to be told that he was not allowed to fill in his wife’s ballot paper for her, nor to go into the booth and oversee her vote. He did end up collecting her completed vote from her and putting it in the box himself, but we couldn’t see any sign that he’d looked at it in between.
Another fellow, apparently illiterate and with limited English, wanted my advice on how to vote Labour. He understood clearly that I could not tell him how to vote, but he needed me to point out which party on the list was Labour. The Labour and National scrutineers had gone home by that point, so I made sure that another election worker was listening and could vouch that I wasn’t providing any inappropriate information. I showed him which party and candidate were Labour, and asked if I could help him with any other parties. He said he remembered something about a church party, so I pointed out Christian Heritage for him.
Being a scrutineer is, by the way, a considerably more boring job than being an election day worker. The scrutineers are appointed by political parties to make sure the election is run impartially, and most polling places have two or three around at any given time. They have to wear a rosette identifying their party, and they are not allowed to speak to any voters or interrupt any proceedings. We had three scrutineers. For some reason the representatives for Labour and National chose to place themselves on either side of the youngest issuing officer, a young man who had to work for the whole day with the two major parties breathing down his neck. Apparently they considered him the most likely to throw the election, because they didn’t pay much attention to the rest of us. By the middle of the afternoon they seemed to have satisfied themselves of his propriety, because they wandered out of the building and didn’t return.
Our third scrutineer was a friendly woman from the Maori Party who occasionally had to be reminded gently that she wasn’t allowed to be helpful in any way, no matter how innocent. She stayed right through to the close of polling and on into the counting, and expressed some surprise that the other scrutineers hadn’t stayed for the whole process.
Counting
Democracy is a game of two halves. At seven o’clock we closed the doors, put some cardboard tables together, and began the counting process. First order of business was to open the special votes box, divide the envelopes up into piles for different electorates, and put them into larger envelopes so that more highly-trained operatives than us could work out which ones are valid and which aren’t. This was easy.
We then proceeded to the counting of the ordinary votes. That is, the non-special ones. For this purpose, we each have one or two pieces of paper with names of candidates written on them. We place any votes for our candidates on their respective piles and pass any for other candidates to the person on our right. By this means, all the votes end up in the right pile and if any get passed on by mistake they’ll most likely be passed all the way round the table and come back to you. That’s how it’s written in the Personal Instruction Manual. In practice, the first thing to do is work out who was going to count Labour candidate Mark Gosche’s votes, as it was readily apparent to all involved that this person would be doing a majority of the vote piling.
Flush with success from the rapid and efficient special-vote division, I volunteered for the Gosche pile. For the next hour or so I maintained an interior monologue that ran along the lines of “Gosche gosche gosche gosche gosche gosche gosche gosche not-gosche-pass-it-on gosche gosche gosche gosche gosche gosche not-gosche-pass-it-on gosche gosche gosche…” This continued until all 1500-odd ballot papers had been counted.
Then we repeated the process for the party votes. This time I opted for the comparitvely lighter job of counting the votes for the New Zealand Family Rights Protection Party, the New Zealand First Party, and the OneNZ Party, none of whom gained the tottering heights of the Labour pile or the much smaller but still respectable National pile.
And after that we did the candidate and party votes for the Maori electorate of Tamaki Makaurau. Then we spent a while deciphering the instructions for packaging up all the votes and left the building around eleven pm.
Based on what we could see in our polling place it was clear that Labour had won by a massive landslide, and that Mark Gosche was the Prime Minister. Oddly, it later turned out that neither of these patterns was closely followed across the country as a whole.
An excellent account of the preparation and the day as an Election worker.
I spent the day and evening as a scrutineer and felt very proud of our friendly, very efficient and low key way of running an election …
“Kiwi” in the best sense of the word.
It was worrying to be told of the behaviour of a “recent migrant” who expected to vote for his wife.
Man, that was so very accurate. I was also an election day worker and I could relate all the way.
I think the breaks are also worth mentioning. I took mine with a Labour scrutineer and talked politics. It was oddly refreshing in the wierdly apolitical environment…
You also didn’t mention feverish supporters that come in and yell stuff like “THANK YOU VERY MUCH! GOOOOO NATIONAL!” when there are two or three other confused voters and six labour scrutineers in the polling place.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. A very entertaining post!!!
Thisis brilliant. I was an aissuing officer myself. I am a Jamaican student doing a Phd in Politics and decided to get involved. I ahd worked before in Elections in Jamaica except I was employed to the media centre of the party now governing the country.
Your article pretty much sums of the day. i could not ahev said it better myself. I worked at Hamilton East - Knighton Normal School. You have sufficiently inspired me to write the tale of my experience, if even for my journal. Thanks again. It was hilarious and just plainly brilliant!
Thank you for an entertaining account.
I was in USA on 17 Sept, but my wife and I were able to download ballot papers from the Hotel’s Computer in Seattle.
We had the declaration witnessed by the Hotel Manager, and they faxed the documents off for us.
So pleased that we were able to take part - many thanks to all the workers who make this very necessary activity possible
Thanks Isaac,
The best advocacy I have seen for the removal of the universal franchise. Hard to believe people are allowed to vote when they don’t have a clue as to:
(a) who they are voting for
(b) how to vote
(c) the fact that its a secret ballot!
A special prize should be given to the half-wit wanting to tell his wife who to vote for. Democracy is clearly safe in his hands.
Perhaps if election day workers were allowed to be sarcastic, this (through shame) would reduce the number of blithering cretins who turn up to put their mark next to the Party that drove them to the booth…
I’ve done time working on a few general elections and referendums, including the one I survived after two hours sleep the night before.
It sounds like not much has changed along the way, but I’m hoping the pay has improved.
My favourite was the old lady (the booth was in a part of Hamilton with a large old people and student population) who showed up at 7.30am, convinced the booth opened at 7.00am. She was most disappointed. Then there was the old fellow who was a little unsteady on his feet and managed to topple the cardboard voting booth. Oh dear.
Oh, Isaac! You got linked by Russell Brown! Surely fame and fortune await you?
As a loyal subject of the Gosche PM I must say that your insightful and eradite political analysis is second to none. Keep on blogging.
regards jonjaz
Best.Anything.Ever
Kathlee:
Yes, it was pleasantly Kiwi. We seem to take a very pragmatic approach to running elections. I’ve always thought it odd that so many other countries haven’t figured out that elections have to be run during the weekend. They’re always on a Saturday here, whereas they seem to be on Tuesdays or Wednesdays in the UK or the USA. This means they have to keep the stations open much later to allow everyone to vote. And that means they can’t start counting until late in the evening. And that means that they have to use all sorts of dangerous mechanical or electronic voting machines. Which leads inexorably, according to the somewhat dubious logic I choose to employ here, to the situation that now prevails in the USA where it’s no longer possible to know who actually won a Presidential election.
Kathlee Guy:
It was worrying to be told of the behaviour of a “recent migrant” who expected to vote for his wife.
It was a bit, but I thought it was handled very well by the other issuing officers. It was made clear in no uncertain terms that this was not permitted.
Craig:
I think the breaks are also worth mentioning. I took mine with a Labour scrutineer and talked politics. It was oddly refreshing in the wierdly apolitical environment…
They would have been worth mentioning, except that there weren’t many of them and they were very short - we had a very busy day.
Our scrutineers were very quiet and formal, apart from the lovely woman from the Maori Party.
You also didn’t mention feverish supporters that come in and yell stuff like “THANK YOU VERY MUCH! GOOOOO NATIONAL!” when there are two or three other confused voters and six labour scrutineers in the polling place.
See, our voters were much too genteel and respectful of the political process for that. I can only remember a couple who even mentioned to me who they intended to vote for.
Hume Johnson:
You have sufficiently inspired me to write the tale of my experience, if even for my journal. Thanks again. It was hilarious and just plainly brilliant!
Thanks for your kind words. Let me know if you write up your election story, and I’ll link to it, or post it here if you like.
bobski:
Hard to believe people are allowed to vote when they don’t have a clue as to:
(a) who they are voting for
(b) how to vote
(c) the fact that its a secret ballot!
I think (b) is perfectly forgiveable. Lots of people know the general principles of voting, but not the details of what the paper looks like. If someone has never voted before, doesn’t read English well, and finds the ballot paper confusing, I say good on them for having the guts to admit it and the integrity to ask for an explanation from an unbiased person before they get to the voting booth.
(c) isn’t absolute in all circumstances - you are allowed to ask someone else to help record your vote if it makes the difference between voting and not voting - if you’re blind, for example. But I agree it’s a general principle that people should be aware of, and the overwhelming majority definitely are,
(a) is more problematic. I don’t think anybodyis completely indifferent to who they vote for. But some people do show up at the polling station with only a rough idea - especially if they know who they don’t want, but aren’t clear on all the alternatives. I think it’s especially true of the electorate vote, where most of the candidates’ names are unfamiliar to just about everybody.
Personally, I’m for a combination of universal franchise and representative democracy such as we currently have. I think people en masse are reasonably good at selecting capable people to represent them most of the time. But I don’t think the average person has the time, experience or patience to make a good decision about actual legislation, which is why I’m not in favour of direct democracy or excessive use of referenda.
A special prize should be given to the half-wit wanting to tell his wife who to vote for.
I thought one guy in 1500 was pretty good. I didn’t encounter anyone else so unclear on the principle, and he didn’t seem particularly upset when he was told it wasn’t allowed.
Perhaps if election day workers were allowed to be sarcastic, this (through shame) would reduce the number of blithering cretins who turn up to put their mark next to the Party that drove them to the booth…
Perhaps I have a rosy view of humanity, but I saw hardly anybody I thought didn’t know what they were doing. Some were unclear on details, some needed a little help, but I’m convinced the vast majority of them knew who they wanted to vote for, and made an effort to have their vote recorded correctly.
Karen:
You got linked by Russell Brown! Surely fame and fortune await you?
A certain limited degree of fame, perhaps. Fortune may be a little harder to come by.
It is not the way of my people to admit this, because nobody’s better than anyone else in this great egalitarian nation of ours, and who does Russell Brown think he is being so famous just because he’s such a good writer and all insightful and witty and that sort of thing, but I was actually quite chuffed.
What then would you have made of our vote count “chanting” in the Epsom electorate….
Not Worth, Keith Locke’s, Hide!!!
This was where we (apparently) saw intelligent MMP strategic voting at work in NZ - We do now have 2 Epsom MPs & one green painted gnome that likes to parade his fruit down Broadway!
Still LOL.
P.S. I forgot to ask - did they let you keep your Inconveniently Large Democracy Box as a souvenir of your day?
Rita:
The temptation is strong, but I managed to restrain myself to chanting on the inside. Too much chanting might lead to a conga line, which would just hold up the vote count.
I do still have my Inconveniently Large Democracy Box, because I left it at home on the day, and nobody has asked for it back yet.
Oh, cool, Russell used that link then. Thought you deserved a wider audience for that one, Isaac: personally, I thought it was one of your best, most insightful, and enjoyable pieces of writing snice Green Room. Thankyou very much for sharing it!
I think the Inconveniently Large Democracy Box should be kept for the cats. Because I remember being trained in childhood to think that cats LIKE to hide in boxes.
Except for the cat from Spain, of course.
Sorry, I’m getting off topic.